10-21-2014, 11:06 AM | #2101 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2014
Age: 47
Posts: 9
|
Re: TWG CXXIV: Super Smash Brothers
You guys are awfully quiet!
|
10-21-2014, 01:48 PM | #2102 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2014
Age: 47
Posts: 9
|
Re: TWG CXXIV: Super Smash Brothers
I sent in my kill, can we start the day already?
|
10-21-2014, 02:27 PM | #2103 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2014
Age: 50
Posts: 0
|
Re: TWG CXXIV: Super Smash Brothers
yeah can we kill Zelda now
|
10-21-2014, 03:06 PM | #2104 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2014
Age: 47
Posts: 9
|
Re: TWG CXXIV: Super Smash Brothers
No, no you can not.
|
10-21-2014, 03:33 PM | #2105 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2014
Age: 47
Posts: 9
|
Re: TWG CXXIV: Super Smash Brothers
Where's your long post mega man, I need a good laugh!
|
10-21-2014, 04:17 PM | #2106 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2014
Age: 48
Posts: 5
|
Re: TWG CXXIV: Super Smash Brothers
It's coming. I got some other stuff to do first. Later this evening!
|
10-21-2014, 05:33 PM | #2107 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2014
Age: 47
Posts: 9
|
Re: TWG CXXIV: Super Smash Brothers
On a serious note, based on the flip (so basically answer this after the flip) who do you feel is the last two wolves link and Charizard?
|
10-21-2014, 09:20 PM | #2108 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2014
Age: 47
Posts: 9
|
Re: TWG CXXIV: Super Smash Brothers
This isn't on the main page what is wrong with you guys???...!!!???...!?!.!?.?.?!?!.!?.??.!
|
10-21-2014, 09:25 PM | #2109 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2014
Age: 49
Posts: 8
|
Re: TWG CXXIV: Super Smash Brothers
its the night phase
there's not a whole lot to discuss at the moment just hold tight for a little while longer. |
10-21-2014, 09:36 PM | #2110 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2014
Age: 50
Posts: 0
|
Re: TWG CXXIV: Super Smash Brothers
someone wants to play twg
actually that's worrying me a bit wolves should feel a sense of defeat not excitement |
10-21-2014, 09:37 PM | #2111 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2014
Age: 50
Posts: 0
|
Re: TWG CXXIV: Super Smash Brothers
so you're perfectly aware that if you're a wolf you're more than likely gong to lose this game right
you hear that wolves sweet |
10-21-2014, 09:38 PM | #2112 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2014
Age: 50
Posts: 0
|
Re: TWG CXXIV: Super Smash Brothers
|
10-21-2014, 09:38 PM | #2113 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2014
Age: 49
Posts: 8
|
Re: TWG CXXIV: Super Smash Brothers
honesty I'm not gonna fight hard for Zelda b/c I already have an auto-win circle but I think Zelda's more town just from behavior BUT WE ALL KNOW HOW WELL THAT'S WORKED FOR ME THIS GAME
|
10-21-2014, 10:01 PM | #2114 | |||
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2014
Age: 48
Posts: 5
|
Re: TWG CXXIV: Super Smash Brothers
I'm exhausted, so there isn't going to be a nice flow to me ripping up Ike. Luckily, I don't have to speak on behalf of the posts very much.
1. D1 Initially, there's a bit of distancing between Ike and Bowser, with Bowser voting for Ike. So it's kind of odd that when votes start building up on Bowser, Ike puts him in his green pile. Upon Villager asking why the hell he's there, he basically just says gut, but then also says that means he shouldn't have votes on him: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
-- Ike was complaining about lack of things to discuss, so I'm going to just post this analysis one part at a time as I finish them. You're welcome! |
|||
10-21-2014, 10:11 PM | #2115 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2014
Age: 49
Posts: 8
|
Re: TWG CXXIV: Super Smash Brothers
I wasn't complaining about the lack of things to discuss, Zelda was.
I felt like Bowser's posts early on felt very natural. I liked them because of that. This is pretty ironic b/c the last time I saw choof play as a wolf I immediately called him out for difference in tone. Yeah it was an early read, and one that I felt less and less comfortable about until his claim. The viscosity in my read on him is apparent. For you to say that I am a partner with Bowser here through this logic is pretty simple to do, and I can do exactly the same thing with what you said about Pikachu (even though you didn't town read them, you still went against the grain of the thread in your opinion of them, which is what you're basically calling me out for.) And yes, I called them town while they voted me. I don't care if you think I'm a wolf or not, that doesn't really influence my opinion of you. This is what players who can think beyond the first level of meta are capable of doing. Once people voted and unvoted you, you went into clear OMGUS mode. The fact that you have since tunneled on me doesn't change my read on you, and it never really factors into how I read people. And yes if you care about the third post that you quoted then you are, in fact, making a big deal out of nothing. Yes, Bowser was voting me "on and off" and I was still reading him town. Big deal. |
10-21-2014, 11:08 PM | #2116 | ||||||||
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2014
Age: 48
Posts: 5
|
Re: TWG CXXIV: Super Smash Brothers
Let's talk more about viscosity in reads, shall we?
2. D2 So after claiming on D1 that he felt like Bowser was town, Ike makes a reads post, where he suddenly 180s and agrees with the votes against Bowser. This is his explanation for the change: Quote:
In that same reads post, he says that reads me green. However, when the votes start rolling up on Bowser... Quote:
Quote:
Next, Dedede points out that it could be wolfy for me to be acting sure that I know there's a roleblocker in the game. When I explain that I am almost positive just based on the game design, there being a bunch of blues and all, this is Ike's response: Quote:
Bowser attempts to discredit my incredibly valid point by passing it off as me looking for someone to roleblock. Ike entertains this dumb idea: Quote:
And I think both Bowser and Ike knew it, because then a series of very strange events happens very quickly: 1) Bowser hints that he has a blue role. 2) Ike unvotes Bowser. 3) Ike pushes him to hardclaim. 4) Bowser fakeclaims Cop. The most telling thing here is the tone. Ike is panicking! Quote:
Quote:
Then he probes a little harder, still without making an actual vote: Quote:
Ike takes his vote off of Bowser, who he just finished reading red. He puts his vote on me, who he just finished reading green. And he justifies it with what is possibly the most ambiguous thing I've ever read in TWG: "I don't see any wolves on that wagon outside of maybe Kirby and Samus and Link and Zelda." Maybe 4/6 people in the vote are wolves, but I don't see any wolves on it, guys! Oh, and he just finished reading Zelda and Samus as green. All without making a vote. This does not resemble a real human thought process at all. And we're just getting started! |
||||||||
10-21-2014, 11:14 PM | #2117 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2014
Age: 48
Posts: 5
|
Re: TWG CXXIV: Super Smash Brothers
That last point got really convoluted (almost as convoluted as his reasoning), but basically what I'm getting down to there is that what a real human would have done in that situation is immediately vote for Mario, who he just finished reading wolf, but instead he was desperate for a reason to vote me, who he just finished reading green.
Because I was on the scent, and he knew it. |
10-21-2014, 11:32 PM | #2119 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2014
Age: 48
Posts: 5
|
Re: TWG CXXIV: Super Smash Brothers
This is a really lame thing to do after finishing the last post with "we're just getting started", but I'm short on time and dying to go to sleep, so this bit's going to be kind of skimpy.
3. Defending Bowser, and the Surrender After the claim, I spent a significant amount of time attacking Bowser, and Ike spent an equal amount of time fear-mongering. As every day passed, it became more apparent that what I was saying was true, but in spite of the growing pile of evidence against him, Ike clung desperately to the vaguest hope that Bowser could be telling the truth. He argued that a Roleblocker could feasibly favour a Gunsmith block over a Cop block. When Kirby came out, he argued that there was any chance in hell that there could be two Cops in the game. When it became clear that we were looking to lynch Bowser, he continued to try to scare humans with talk of how crazy it'd be to kill anyone who claimed Cop, even if it looked unlikely to be true. He clung to this ridiculous notion long after humanity had accepted it as truth and moved on. And when we shot Bowser, Ike's posting died with him. I think that Ike is another Bowser case. I think that he invested into Bowser in an attempt to keep wolves in the game, and when the curtain came off, he knew that he was too implicated to continue playing the game. None of his votes are in the right place. He didn't vote Pikachu, he voted Kirby over Fox until the reveal, he voted off of Bowser and onto me, and then onto Mario when it was clear that I wasn't going down without a fight. I am almost sure he is red. |
10-21-2014, 11:35 PM | #2120 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2014
Age: 49
Posts: 8
|
Re: TWG CXXIV: Super Smash Brothers
as for you "being on the scent" I actually wasn't really sure where you stood exactly, if my memory serves. Maybe I just don't remember right, it was a while back. I guess that's not really too important.
Yeah my read on Bowser changed. It was not a result of not wanting to bus (meta, I don't soft or hard bus basically ever unless I'm busing Xiz b/c that's fun) or anything, it was because I had been rereading the thread trying to figure out why so many people were reading him scummy. I realized not only that my read wasn't as strong as I thought it was, it also was pretty bad. For probably the only time this game, this turned out to be a correct read of mine. You're talking as if a changing read is inherently wolfy. You should know better. Humans should reread the thread and keep an open mind. I kept mine open and I corrected a false read. It was mainly his behavior. I felt like it was getting odder and odder as the game went on, especially his weird votes on me. Once he claimed cop it all made sense to me; he was just nervous b/c he was a role, that was my thought. I've seen it happen all the time. And yes, while you did bring up a point that there almost certainly is a roleblocker, and that point is rather sound and also almost certainly true, that shouldn't have mattered at that point since we were getting close to lynching people. Mechanics shouldn't have been the topic of discussion, the hangman's noose should've been, that was my point with that post. So what if I acknowledged you made a point I hadn't considered. That's not even contradictory. I don't even say your point is wrong or bad, I just didn't think it was relevant. Get over yourself if you think that's me slipping on a banana peel when wording a post. And no I never entertained the idea Bowser brought up. I simply acknowledged it as terrible wolf play. That's because it is. And yes Peach's claim was right there but that wasn't relevant to my point against Bowser. It was at this point in responding to your post that I almost said that "No roleblocker would ever soft to town that they're the roleblocker" but then I remembered I've seen a game where someone was dumb enough to do that. So I guess that's not the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Still, its a terrible play, and that's all I meant by that post. The fact that you call "softing roleblocker" not a terrible play actually made me laugh, btw. And yeah, no one should ever just softclaim a role like that because of several reasons which I might look dumb for pointing out in hindsight. The main one being that all you're letting mafia know is that you're a role, and they might vote you and attempt to play it off as not noticing the post or saying they don't believe the claim, etc. It doesn't work like that in forum TWG. In some mediums it does, but not text TWG. Also, you're just robbing town of the info of your check if you're a cop or a doctor because if you die the following night, this is ToS where there's wills; the info is just lost. And yes, you don't vote a claim there. Ever. There's a reason you were the only one voting for Bowser; its because voting a cop claim there is such a bad play that it wishes it could be a shit tier play someday. And yes I was upset that I had gotten dAnceguy germs or something where I out roles. I had led a lynch on a claimed cop. This is different from the Falcon lynch because this is something *I* did wrong, not someone else. I felt bad. I thought I had screwed up. If anything, you should thank me b/c we probably wouldn't be in this position if I hadn't of led the lynch on him. And we didn't get much info from the Captain Falcon lynch, so I wanted info. I incorporated wagonomics and attempted to see how was voting who and whether or not it was coming from a townie mindset. I looked at the people on both wagons and felt like Mario was getting pushed by the wolves whereas there were a lot of people I was reading at least town leaning that were voting you. No one was lock clear, and there were 4 possibles that I named in my post. I didn't think they were all together, almost certainly, which is what I meant when I called them out. I still think that there's at most 1 wolf in those names. Obviously, this makes more sense now but w/e. Also I unvoted you in the end because of the emotion in your posts which I felt was genuine. I had no reason to do that as a wolf. Maybe if the other wagon was a wolf I get some townreads for going hero mode or something, but as a wolf I would have no reason to hop between the bandwagons there. But yeah, bring up more things that are this easy to shoot down. I'm waiting for you to bring up a point I can't respond to. Surely there's at least one or two if I'm as confirmed of a wolf as you say I am? |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|