Flash Flash Revolution - View Single Post

**bmah** · 02-17-2012, 01:49 PM

I can go into a long explanation, but all I'll say for now is that you only have to look at the physical aspects to realize which is easier. Three fingers taking care of all four arrows or two fingers on each hand taking care of two arrows each? If these fingers were little guys, you can compare that to teamwork - therefore it'll take a lot less work to play with two hands than one.

If you're not playing successfully with two hands, then it's just your lack of being accustomed to such a setup. But physically, it's a lot more beneficial to play with two hands - so much that I would consider playing with one hand a handicap.

Existing one-handed players play with one hand because 1) they either take more pride in playing songs with one hand, or 2) they're used to playing with one hand vs with two, although it's just a matter of learning a new setup to overcome the initial discomfort.

02-17-2012, 01:49 PM	#3
bmah shots FIRED Global Moderator, User Support, Judge Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Edmonton, AB Age: 35 Posts: 8,448	Re: Easier.. or more complicated? I can go into a long explanation, but all I'll say for now is that you only have to look at the physical aspects to realize which is easier. Three fingers taking care of all four arrows or two fingers on each hand taking care of two arrows each? If these fingers were little guys, you can compare that to teamwork - therefore it'll take a lot less work to play with two hands than one. If you're not playing successfully with two hands, then it's just your lack of being accustomed to such a setup. But physically, it's a lot more beneficial to play with two hands - so much that I would consider playing with one hand a handicap. Existing one-handed players play with one hand because 1) they either take more pride in playing songs with one hand, or 2) they're used to playing with one hand vs with two, although it's just a matter of learning a new setup to overcome the initial discomfort.