12-27-2014, 01:22 PM
|
#17
|
Signature Extraordinare~~
Song Submission & Events Manager
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 28
Posts: 6,366
|
Re: Old timer getting back in; need help
Myelinated nerves can fire between 300 to 1000 times per second in the human body and transmit information at 200 miles per hour. What matters here is how frequently these nerves can fire (or "send messages").
The nerves in your eye are not exempt from this limit. Your eyes can physiologically transmit data that quickly and your eyes/brain working together can interpret up to 1000 frames per second.
However, we know from experimenting (as well as simple anecdotal experience) that there is a diminishing return in what frames per second people are able to identify. Although the human eye and brain can interpret up to 1000 frames per second, someone sitting in a chair and actively guessing at how high a framerate is can, on average, interpet up to about 150 frames per second.
The point: 60 fps is not a 'waste'. 120 fps is not a 'waste' (provided you have a 120hz monitor capable of such display). There IS a very noticable difference between 15 fps and 60 fps. Many will say there IS a noticeable difference between 40 and 60 fps. Lastly, the limit of the human eye is NOT as low as 30-60 fps. It's just not.
The origin of the myth: The origin of the myth probably has to do with limitations of television and movies. Movies, when they were recorded on film reel, limited themselves to 24 frames per second for practical purposes. If there is a diminishing return in how many frames people can claim to actually notice, then the visual difference between 24 fps and 60 fps could not justify DOUBLING the amount of film reel required to film a movie.
With the advent of easy digital storage, these limitations are mostly arbitrary anymore.
The numbers often cited as the mythological "maximum" the eye can see are 30 fps, 40 fps, and 60 fps.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by YoshL
butts.
|
Last edited by gold stinger; 12-27-2014 at 01:30 PM..
|
|
|