[xXOpkillerXx]

Originally Posted by Dinglesberry

I meant more so like, denser jumpstream patterns, like suppose for example you had

2 (13) 2 (14)

As a pattern in jumpstream - in order to achieve the same nps with streams the patterns would be have to be faster since you don't have the double notes, but equally "difficult" streams would just be like, a 4 note one hand trill based on the pattern of js etc, but that wouldn't make up the same nps

I don't think you can compare [2, {13}, 2, {14}] with [2, 1 ,2, 1] at a faster speed, or I don't understand why you would ? An equivalent stream would rather be [2, 1, 3, 2, 1, 4] or [2, 3, 1, 2, 4, 1] at a faster speed.

Originally Posted by Dinglesberry

Also consider a situation, a pattern that's just a jumptrill 1. (12) (34) (12)... Is arguably the same difficulty as 2. (1) (4) (1) (4) or even 3. (12) (1) (12)... Despite different nps

Here, example 1. and 2. would have the same nps-per-receptor, even though their total nps would be different by a factor of 2. So yes, the difficulty would remain similar. Idk about 3.