[Frank Munoz]

Took it twice


First was a mass generalization of my entire life.
Second is a more current response.

Most of these questions ration to mixed responses.
There is no way to really indicate the actual intent of our 'skepticism', because apparently if you're 'suspicious' it jots it down for hostility?

Another is that it asks for feedback on extreme situations-
"There are people who pushed me so far that we came to blows."
-as if they were in the right, and you were wrong for defending yourself from whatever it is the other person did. It's also impossible to illustrate what 'pushed' means in this example question, cause it can range from
"they talked so much shit about me/family/subject/ect."
to
"they were physically harassing me".
and these wide conceptions are present in a lot of questions.

Though it would be understandable if most of us were actually 'violent/felons',
to find what undermines our (theoretically)frequent aggression/hostility.
it's clear this test isn't suited well for most of us, but it's interesting to see how uh... thin the line is between skepticism/protecting yourself, and violent/hostile.