Flash Flash Revolution - View Single Post - Suspicious Scores thread (Formerly Hacked Scores)

**krunkykai22** · 12-18-2011, 10:30 AM

Personally, I don't really see conclusive evidence that it really is Zierg. Just because the stats are closely alike doesn't necessarily mean it's him. I mean if you want to compare stats you can compare you to Rubix and call hacks, technically speaking (even though yes you're not bs we've seen you play.)

As for the defending himself thing, condoct probably is sitting back laughing and not giving a shit as to what you think of him, which is how a player should be. Calling BS on someone for those minimal reasons is farfetched. I think you would need an IP Check for one to provide proof, then and only then could you have a proven point.

Not to mention, how about just asking Zierg to find out if he did in fact play (even though he could potentially deny the entire case at which we're back to square one.)

12-18-2011, 10:30 AM	#23
krunkykai22 <3 Jumpstream <3 Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Middle of nowhere Age: 37 Posts: 5,436	Re: Hacked Scores thread V2 Personally, I don't really see conclusive evidence that it really is Zierg. Just because the stats are closely alike doesn't necessarily mean it's him. I mean if you want to compare stats you can compare you to Rubix and call hacks, technically speaking (even though yes you're not bs we've seen you play.) As for the defending himself thing, condoct probably is sitting back laughing and not giving a shit as to what you think of him, which is how a player should be. Calling BS on someone for those minimal reasons is farfetched. I think you would need an IP Check for one to provide proof, then and only then could you have a proven point. Not to mention, how about just asking Zierg to find out if he did in fact play (even though he could potentially deny the entire case at which we're back to square one.)