[Magicturbo]

tl;dr the rest of the thread x.x;;;

I'll just point out something simple-minded to me, that may have already been noticed or something.

You disagree with the original quote about "right" and "wrong" being subjective and opinionated.

Originally Posted by Cavernio

People who measure morality in a different way than this are wrong unless someone convinces me otherwise.

If this is the case then why are you open to being convinced? If you disagree with it being opinionated then you'd be supporting that it's factual. Since the possibility of being convinced exists, according to your statement, your statement flaws the definition of a fact, and contradicts itself. I'm not reading all the tl;dr in this thread if the original statement is flawed.