Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

It's like Christmas day! Where's my presents :<

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

The Patashu who stole Christmas stole Christmas! :(

If I remember correctly, he risks a ban of some sort, right?

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

yeah but he rarely says anything in both #kbo and #gaym

pretty sure he just leaves the window open and reads logs later

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

lol Patashu's MIA.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

Ohey I have ratings

[+] 10
[+.] 6
[+?] 5
[?] 1
[-] 1

Resubs
[+] 2
[+.] 2

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

Where the batch notes be?
D:

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

Read OP, not going to be released until Midnight.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

Uhh, what?

If Patashu does not submit, I have to decide whether to wait or just release notes with only three judges within his section (instead of four). It might be the latter. Dunno right now.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

I just found the post that led me to believe this. I bet I read it too fast:

http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/...&postcount=166

/fail, k?

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

hahaha

Mario, you gotta realize when people are pulling your legs. :p

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

Do you think you could get a backup judge to cover Pat's parts?

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

assuming that person would be able to judge with haste!

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

ok it looks it's unlikely that we get notes from patashu, so quick backup judgement would be good.

My idea: splitting patashu's part into 2-3 parts. I can do one of these parts too (or if there's a judge who can do quick judgement of nearly 30 files, that's fine).

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

Proportion the scale back to how it was with three judges, adding a fourth judge to tend to borderline files ONLY (for that group).

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

The only reason why I've suggested a possibility of only three judges is because despite the fact four judges supposedly gives some leeway in scores, even one judge profoundly affects the final outcome. In other words, I think that four judges isn't really creating a true buffer in opinions. That's what it seemed like in past batches.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

Just contacted Patashu and he said that he won't be able to finish judging within the next 2 hours so we definitely need a back-up.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

If you need someone to do it quickly I can do it. I know I'm not the first choice but I'm going to be up for a while tonight and I'm available. I have a resub in that set of files though so someone else would have to judge that one.

If it's okay with you jimerax, I can go half and half with you. Let me know.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

Wouldn't splitting Patashu's up between a couple people just kinda cause issues? With the differing of experience/opinions I don't see that as being the best idea. I really think that being it's this late already just go off a 3 judge system for that group and have someone come in for the borderlines like AJ suggested. It's really not fair to the people who have been waiting to have to wait longer for someone to complete notes now.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

lol man, if it's going to be this quickly hashed up, I'll have a harder time taking these last set of notes seriously. The quality of assessment is never the same when you compare reviews done in 2 hours compared to reviews completed in even one or two days.

I can see the idea becoming quite messy if the plan moves forward like this.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

Yea bmah has a really good point there too. It's kinda hard to make a good judgements in such a short period of time.