Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
Quote:
But yeah; not saying anything about those other results... |
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
In addition, because buizel didn't judge the previous batch, there was a high chance that resubmissions are in danger of being stuck in limbo because of contrasting reviews. I just made a comparison and guess what? I am right.
I did make a suggestion to do something about this several pages back. I am not surprised to see the same results since that issue has not been fixed. Refer to page 35 in this thread for more info. p.s. thank you buizel and silvuh for getting the notes done really fast :) p.p.s. buizel you reviewed too many files lol |
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
Oh and buizel, by > did you mean < or $, because there's no such thing as >. :P
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
I'm glad someone is being strict at least.
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
buizel judge my chart plz honey
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
Quote:
edit: shitty quality confirmed |
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
I'll probably finish off my notes this weekend. Got a good running start on them already but wanna bang em out a little quick this time just in case I go into labor lol. Less than 2 weeks from my due date now >.>
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
Quote:
I believe what you just stated there contradicts the whole privilege you have been given. I might be 90% stupid, but the 10% that's left knows that some sounds can only be synced with 12nd, 64th or even 96th, for that matter, even if the stepper narrowed the BPM perfectly. Because, you know... Song artists can place sounds where the hell they want without caring about BPM. Also, I thought that sync was more important than the notes' colors. Color-blindness happens. You can't just give a file a score of 3 out of 5 because of something like: "While the file was fun and the song choice interesting, you used weird colors for your arrows. Therefore, you're a horrible stepper." This isn't strict, it is simply unfair! |
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
Jeeze u all are really bad at sarcasm
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
he's being sarcastic (I hope so)
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
Super ninjad
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
Wow.
My post about the color notes was complete sarcasm. I use color notes for emphasis in like all my charts lmao and another thing. I mentioned from this point on I was going to be a butthurt furry and make my ratings STRICT. I judged completely legitimate. Silvuh relax you got the good side of things. Your files annoy the shit out of me because you pick some repetitive and annoying slow piano songs, but your technical-manias wins over enough judgments. I have this to say HOLY SHIT PEOPLE LEARN HOW TO USE PITCH RELEVANCY. Thank you for playing. To answer other things, yes I mean < or > whatever meaning the other file is better. You get what I mean. Bmah, "From "Passage D"(by 2 submitters) to "Youshou 02" and "An Unwanted Magician and a Cheery Rebel", "Dance and Zeal", "Fatum Anima", "I Remember When", excluding "Sun and Stars". [Resubmissions - 5] From "A Battle for the Sky" to "Fast Asleep"." I'm pretty sure this is what I judged. |
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
PS
Quote:
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
itt: we discuss sarcasm.
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
Quote:
also, judging unnecessarily strict in comparison to your normal judging style is retarded. |
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
Quote:
don't worry, I just removed whatever was irrelevant |
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
Quote:
DON'T JUDGE ME FOR BEING MYSELF MOM. |
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
Quote:
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
finding a file you like =/= finding a good file, because even good files can go past you since you're having a bias towards things that appeal to you
EDIT: Quote:
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright FlashFlashRevolution