Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

From here, there was 14 points (7 judges accounted for).

With 10 judges, acceptance might be something like...14/20? Both roughly about 70% scores.

It's just a comparison, but it might give you an idea of what you're looking for.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

Halloweenies was actually already submitted before when it had rolls and when it had 32nd streams instead of trills.
Results:
32nd streams are a no
Rolls are a no
Trills are a no

:???:

PS. Congratulations AJ and Kayla

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

11 judges have voted now. so max point is 22.

As for the current status (from higher to lower):
21, 17, 16, 15, (14), 13, 13, 11, 10, 10, 10, 10, 7.

borderline will be 13 or 14. or some of these ones will be in the conditional queue.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

Damn, how did a file get 21 points now, but not when it was first judged o.0

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

Given that the next real anything-goes batch will be for a long time, how about this:
- top 4 or 5 files got enough "yes" votes to get into queue
- the next files, all the way down to the 10s, averaged "yes with fix", so they should be in the conditional queue, and judges (or jx/bmah) can determine when they have been fixed enough. These files were good enough that with fixes they should easily get 14+/22 if we voted again.
- the 7 got a lot of "no" votes, so it should wait until the next batch(es).

Actually, even better, instead of using a 0x+1y+2z point system, let's just write it out as (x,y,z). Then we can see which option people are leaning towards. For instance, with 10 judges, (0,10,0) would be a clear candidate for the conditional queue; on the other hand, (5,0,5) would get the same number of points, but doesn't really need fixes, it's just that half of the judges really dislike the file itself.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

Running men!! Or 1234231324321 this pattern

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

[1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234][1234]

is a yes

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

I tried tapping that out on my desk...depending on speed, I can see a lot of people screwing up in a pattern like that.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

Its my favourite pattern ever

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

and you were the one talking about "awkward patterns" pffffff

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

Hey, I use that pattern like once in a while

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

liar

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

a file that got put into the borderline doesn't necessarily mean that it was a bad file, but judges felt a need to accept it as a borderline file

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

Ahh, I see. Makes sense.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

So........my file rejected yet? Just curious. lol.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

yep why can't people just wait for answers

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

awesome and I can wait, but there is also no harm in asking, not like I have been posting non stop about it, this is my first time asking since it was mentioned it was being put up for voting......

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

You're kidding right?
EDIT: derp

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

hoorray for hidden text. gg halogen ;)