|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
Aerospace 8-8-8-8-7-4 (Niala hating damb) 7.16
Gravity Blast 8-8-8-8-7-8 (Carlos your review was ****ing hilarious) 7.83 Steel Monster 4-5-9-7-8-5 (Subjective as hell whoa, missed the 6.5 by a single point >:C) 6.33 |
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
autumn insomnia - 8/7/8/6/8/7 - 7.3
fareast - 4/7/7/7/5/4 - 5.6 ice - 5/5/9/5/7/8 - 6.5 magnum - 8/7/6/9/8/6 - 7.3 shotgun - 6/8/7/7/8/6 - 7.0 my easy file got bashed more than anything rofl. Ice's ratings made me lol though I was expecting it kinda, but I'm glad people liked the collab files and magnum at least :) |
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
Quote:
BTW If anyone thought I was being unfair to a particular person, just wanna mention that I never even looked up the pack folder so I have no idea who stepped which PS I wish there was a rule to not mention stepcharter anywhere in the simfile (Looking at you DarkZtar) PS2 This is my first time to judge an FFR batch.. How did you like it?? |
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
7/8/8/8/8/8 - nous (this file was half-assed in certain places, cool it got these ratings though)
6/6/7/7/8/9 - pure ruby (ah, didn't expect this) Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Also what's the deal with these "oh hurr hurr copy/paste" comments, honestly for a song like Pure Ruby it's going to be needed. |
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
If a song forces you to use repetitive patterns, chances are it's not an excellent song choice...
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
FML.
I somehow managed to send my old version of my [Resubmission] from five months ago. >_>" 4/10's galore. fuuuuuuucccccccccc. nothing in the file changed from last batch. *groan* |
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
1/2/5/5/6/6
avg 4.16 lol question Razor: what did you mean by the 0.000 syncing/offset? |
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
Quote:
I'm not super happy about my results either but whaddaya knoe you just have to accept them |
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
Aww I screwed up some of my bb code in my notes, poop~
2/6/7/7/5/5, average of 5.333, I expected so much worse xD appreciate the notes, nicely done by the new guys too. Any questions can be directed to be via PM, I'm happy to answer anything or help with anything. |
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
Flamingo: 7 / 7 / 9 / 7 / 9 / 8
Hello (Luke Da Duke Remix): 8 / 7 / 9 / 8 / 8 / 9 MLPFiM Medley [Heavy]: 8 / 8 / 8 / 10 / 8 / 9 MLPFiM Medley [Standard]: 8 / 8 / 10 / 8 / 8 / 8 Pinkie's Castle: 8 / 8 / 7 / 7 / 8 / 9 Better than expected :D Also: Quote:
EDIT: Since you asked so nicely I guess next batch I'll make all 5 of my files renard songs instead of just 4 8) |
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
Destination of the Heart: 8/5/8/6/9/6 avg: exactly 7 lol
Cool I guess :3 Will look at suggestions. SO this being my first go around, whats the cutoff score for being added in game? |
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
Quote:
It flows about as well as icy's M-A file, which is sort of my benchmark for making alternating JS feel okay. It's possible to make alternating JS with the longest 8th jack being 3 arrows long, but that leads to repetitive, roll-feeling patterns. So 4 arrow jacks are basically the minimum. I can (and will) clean up those 5 arrow jacks but really I don't think that's the problem with the file. hint: the problem with the file is that it's boring as fck. which was actually sort of intentional :> |
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
icy's M-A file was horrendous why do you benchmark that file ?_?
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
Quote:
Sometimes it's nice to set yourself a low bar to jump over, anyway :p |
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
Quote:
(j/k) |
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
Mostly Dark Universe: 9/8/8/6/5/5 ?_? - 6.83
Chronograph: 8/8/7/7/7/6 - 7.17 I like how kommi gives MDU a 9 and then half of the judges apparently didn't enjoy it whatsoever. T_T I also like how I spent considerably less time on Chronograph, and had nobody look at it prior to submitting it. 100% shot in the dark. I was honestly hoping for MDU to be the one with good numbers across the board considering the time spent haha, but oh well. :< |
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
Shotgun Surgery: 6-8-7-7-8-6, 7 avg.
Chris R Battle Theme: 6-6-8-7-6-8 6.83 avg You guys kick ass. |
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
Also, MN, with regards to all of the fine-tuning suggestions you made for the first half of Chronograph -
Quote:
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
Quote:
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:22 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright FlashFlashRevolution