Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

Also, I have no idea how to add the two second silence at the beginning of the file and I think my file needs it. Halp anyone?

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

I just use Audacity and go to generate>silence>2.00 and that adds the silence in for me. Just make sure you have the start of the song selected and to re-sync the file, because the silence will probably affect the offset.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

Okay, easy enough. I will need to send the file again though. I'm still unclear on what happens to conditionally queued files - am I waiting on word from anyone if the changes I've made are acceptable?

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

Make sure to adjust the gap accordingly

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

Wanted to talk about this and didn't know where else, so I figure this thread is as good as ever since theory is discussed a lot here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dURfqCAe3ds

Almost everyone would say this is a bad chart. I think this is actually really good, for two reasons:

- Clearly defined stages. In other words, it has a lot of memorable PARTS. You can talk about "messing up on the slow part." It's not just one continuous thing like most of Quasar.

- The patterns vary a lot. This is where I severely break from most of the modern charters. Songs with unexpected patterns stay interesting to play. If the patterns are mostly the same, all you need to know is how you or someone else does on the first 10 seconds and you can extrapolate the rest of the song.

Files to me were most interesting when they were expected to be like levels. DDR and PIU both promoted this kind of file making, but it died out with the idea of technical correctness. (I don't think this has anything to do with the decline of Stepmania though. That's probably just due to the decline of arcades in general, as well as the decline of standalone forum communities in favor of social networking websites or mass aggregator websites like 4chan/reddit/tumblr.)

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

That was a cool file. I think the problem isn't so much with files like that vs technical files of today but more so files with tons of ghost notes vs files of today.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

Nothing beats Yanah's file for that song sry.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

rip

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

These songs were moved to the queue.

CmR (hi19hi19)
Alone Again At 4AM (foilman8805)
Powerpuff Gabberz (HammyMcSquirrel)
Miss Candy on TV (Dossar vs. qqwref)
Just why (Dossar vs. qqwref)
In Aisles (Coolboyrulez0)
The earth blew up (bob bob)
Night Walker (hi19hi19)

I'll add songs from HS batch, and SAP update.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

updated songs and SAP.

Adjusted average > 8 - 3pts
Adjusted average > 7 - 2pts
others - 1pt
(and getting all 1 ratings - -1pt)

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

Rofl I didn't know Tsugihagi had FGO potential. xD

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

jx I still need to know which bursts you want me to fix in Canary

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

sending in fixes for car sax and piano etude demon fire

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

lol I wasn't even serious about these, removed anyway

sry for the delay but added detailed notes for the fix.

ok thanks.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

Was the file ever sent?
I'd like to avoid a repeat of the St. Scarhand thing where I wind up with a file to my name that I don't like...

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

I took out the minijacks in the version I sent a while ago. Should I take the hands out after the 32nd rolls, and is that the only fix I have to do?

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

lol why does ZS not have [FGO] tag I thought it was mid fgo (v3 I mean)

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

Differently as in different Patterns?

edit: nvm, gonna send a fix soon

edit2: sent

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

Probably because:

I think the tag Tsugihagi had belonged to your file lol.