Flash Flash Revolution

Flash Flash Revolution (http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/index.php)
-   FFR Batch Forum (http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/forumdisplay.php?f=100)
-   -   Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showthread.php?t=116884)

Teh Avenger 10-4-2011 05:37 PM

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 
The tension mounts as judgement day closes in....

hi19hi19 10-7-2011 11:39 PM

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 
You got the fixes for CmR, I thought. So then it should be in the queued list? I just want to make sure.

Elite Ninja 10-7-2011 11:45 PM

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 
haha so many changes I have missed on FFR.

bmah 10-8-2011 12:02 AM

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Elite Ninja (Post 3548384)
I didn't see a post that mentions who gets to judge what files. Do you guys keep that a secret now or something?



_____

Rebirth0 10-8-2011 01:27 AM

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 
i hope u gize liked my files dey wer my 1st i evr maid

jimerax 10-8-2011 01:58 AM

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 
It looks average quality of the batch is getting better recently...
And yeah, "Judgement Deadline" and "Who judges what files" are basically secret so far, just wait until notes are up. It shouldn't take THAT long.

Quote:

Originally Posted by hi19hi19 (Post 3548389)
You got the fixes for CmR, I thought. So then it should be in the queued list? I just want to make sure.

got and reviewed on it but sry I haven't concluded about the file (along with Mario's Mortal Kombat file) yet. I'll look into the detail again.

bob bob 10-8-2011 03:09 AM

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 
people getting better at stepping?

Shlock horror

MarioNintendo 10-8-2011 09:51 AM

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jimerax (Post 3548449)
It looks average quality of the batch is getting better recently...
And yeah, "Judgement Deadline" and "Who judges what files" are basically secret so far, just wait until notes are up. It shouldn't take THAT long.


got and reviewed on it but sry I haven't concluded about the file (along with Mario's Mortal Kombat file) yet. I'll look into the detail again.

Well, i did give a fixed up version which i made as good as i possibly could based on your feedback...

Just tell me if it's still not ok, i'll gladly try to make it better!

Nullifidian 10-8-2011 11:36 AM

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 
I was just thinking, the bonus/penalty part makes it really ridiculously tough to get any extra points when there's only 3 judges on one file.
edit: kiwi just pointed out to me that max we can get now is 15/20 rating with only 3 judges lmfao

ichliebekase 10-8-2011 11:40 AM

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 
The three judges per team is new and the OP hasn't been updated with this system. Just wait or ask what the terms of an accepted file are.

TC_Halogen 10-8-2011 11:46 AM

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TC_Halogen (Post 3542672)
13 = +1 SAP; 14-15 = +2 SAP (+1 for 15)?
(this also implies a 13 point score is minimum for unconditional acceptance.)

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimerax (Post 3543388)
yeah, in this case yours looks fine.
12 (occasionally 11) will be borderline zone.

I figure this information would be alright to share, because it clears up some discrepancies in the new system.

Basically, 13 will be the minimum pass, and 12 (with a few 11s depending on rating distribution) will be the borderline zone.

Hope that clears everything up!

qqwref 10-8-2011 12:02 PM

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 
I like the idea of 13 being a minimum pass, but we should keep in mind that it will make a ? an auto-reject, so I think if we see something like +/+/? or +/+./? we should get another judge to take a look at it.

Elite Ninja 10-8-2011 12:10 PM

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 
so then how will the simfile artist points work this time around?

Niala 10-8-2011 12:14 PM

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Elite Ninja (Post 3548535)
so then how will the simfile artist points work this time around?

Look down two posts from yours.

Elite Ninja 10-8-2011 12:19 PM

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Niala (Post 3548536)
Look down two posts from yours.

thats for files getting accepted though. I mean the points that allow you to be able to submit more files if you have so many of them.

Nullifidian 10-8-2011 12:29 PM

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 
The bonus points he's talking about (getting 3 ++'s or 4 ++'s on a file etc.)

00Razor00 10-8-2011 12:57 PM

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 
Glad to see some change in the system.

Niala 10-8-2011 04:28 PM

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Elite Ninja (Post 3548537)
thats for files getting accepted though. I mean the points that allow you to be able to submit more files if you have so many of them.

Halogen:
13 = +1 SAP; 14-15 = +2 SAP (+1 for 15)?
(this also implies a 13 point score is minimum for unconditional acceptance.)

SAP=simfile artist points.

++'s will work in the same way, so:
Getting ++ from 2 judges -> bonus +2
Getting ++ from 3 judges -> bonus +5
Clearly no ++ from 4 judges because there are only 3 judges per team.

The amount of points given might change, but the system will stay the same.

jimerax 10-8-2011 08:17 PM

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 
Basically what Niala said.

+/+/+ will be 2 points, might give 3 points for ++/+/+ this time.

TC_Halogen 10-8-2011 08:34 PM

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qqwref (Post 3548534)
I like the idea of 13 being a minimum pass, but we should keep in mind that it will make a ? an auto-reject, so I think if we see something like +/+/? or +/+./? we should get another judge to take a look at it.

Variations of 11/12 will be considered borderline, not auto-rejected. There's still a chance that it can pass when given to future judges.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright FlashFlashRevolution