Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 

parchment,

3 times in a row

and forgetting to give someone back their fancy desk

who already left town




bruH

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 

Really? I don't see these posts as wishy-washy at all. There's been no less than a full page of posts in a small pond of roleplay, that has so far been cause for structure of some early votes. I agree it's worth keeping an eye on, but wishy-washy myself of whether or not it's alignment indicative because defense options on day 5. Not really a stellar idea that I would consider 100% revolutionary and give them all the credit for, sidekick.

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 

Dotty

I know right, revolutionary vote. oh em gee zus.

Fingers crossed for posts, we were all active to confirm & start a little early, but we can't be active in-thread after 2 days? Must be one heckuva weekend.

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 

having trouble parsing this last sentence. what are you trying to say?

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 

to everyone saying they hope there's more posts later, fingers crossed for more interactions, etc: there's not gonna be when we all take that same approach! be the activity you want to see!

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 

I'm trying to say that you mentioned you were not a fan of the first person to point out del and dotty being inactive and wanting to start putting vote towards inactive, but it's not really a revolutionary idea from one single person that should be paid attention to, given that multiple people are on-board with testing the inactives.

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 

Hard to be the activity I want to see when it's only the two of us, and Rolf here! Ma ha ha ha howr!

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 

okay, i understand now. much appreciated!

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 

So would you think that somebody posting in a obvious and blatant gimmick to avoid being targeted would be leaning more wolfy then?
If voting for people posting less is what's going to happen here this phase, I'd avoid Del because of this for now. Would be weird to draw attention onto yourself like this questioning that vote.

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 

this is true...

well, if it's just us, my dear neighbor, let me ask you what your take on apollo pushing the acquisitioner read on you is. where'd he get it from? why's he repeatedly calling attention to it?

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 

Maple can you stop? Whatever that gimmick is trying to be, it's not funny and has nothing to do with Animal Crossing roleplay. Can you choose a different gimmick if avoiding the acquisitioner is the goal.

Whoever is talking like that, if you continue I am going to assume you have that weird adult baby/diaper fetish. That is how those people talk.

The game is only anonymous for now!

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 

The main idea is that lynching inactives help wolves in this specific setup because they just need to post like 2 times or more to be fine.
It's also making the acquisitioner's life harder by reducing their pool of targets.

So, I was wondering if being pro inactive would go against the wolf agenda and motivate them to defend the stance that inactives must be gone.

I'm curious about how others approach this.

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 

Vote Count:
Phase ends 3/9 @ 00:00
==============

Maple [1]
Boomer

Zucker [1]
Chief

Tank [1]
Punchy

Apollo [1]
Maple

Cherry [1]
Tank

Del [1]
Molly

Mathilda [1]
Phil

Dotty [2]
Fauna, Agent S

Molly [1]
Julian

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 

Every "W" is a "R" with Maple. That's all you need to know.

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 

Julian is probably my favorite, just look at him

His bit in Molly is the first thing I've read where I'm like "yeah ok, that makes some sense to me, I can see how someone believes it"

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 

Dotty

Bye inactive

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 

It's clear enough what the gimmick is but it is a horrible pain to actually read and it makes me want to stab my eyes out what what

Also I'll join on the inactive plan Dotty

Going to bed before too long so might as well get a vote down now what what

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 

I dont think maples gimmick is wolfy

Sure wolf team doesnt want to be acquired more than town so they are incentivized to try harder to avoid it but doing a attention grabbing gimmick that is obvious and sure to draw attention to themselves is not something id see a wolf doing

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 

Its just squeaky and annoying as heck.

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
 

You basically say "I think this is a good plan but here's why it's also a bad plan" - there's not much substance here is my point what what