Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

i loved that song

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

Really hope it passes ;D

Fun Fact: Every track on that Vexkiddy album is 3:06

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

Silly kids! Word games don't belong here.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

We're just excited, that's all x3 Sorry about that.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

I was only joining in on the fun, sorta killing me that a lot of the judges think that a big chunk of the songs were bland hope I'm not in the mix lol anyways back to waiting on the notes. Cheers to everyone who took the time to take a look at the files and some time out of their daily routines.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

my post was very relevant :D

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

maybe
maybe not

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

notes shoud be posted now and those without notes turned in should be exiled

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

The notes will be up by the end of this week. Maybe Friday.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

Typhlosion has spoken, now you kiddies wait like good boys and girls for those notes. :3

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

I don't reject files just if they're bad, I reject them if they're not good enough. And really, song choice unfortunately is a huge factor for a file's potential. Stop stepping dumpstream songs with 16th hi-hats for 2 minutes. This isn't 2004 fellas



Pr0 h8er. Though my notes may upset some, I'd invite you to send me a pm if you have any concern about your file's judgment. I recall some people not understanding why files were rejected and I couldn't reply a few batches back.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

Hey, those files were fun in 2004, they can still be fun now.
Fact is, FFR has way too many ~artfiles~ and not enough fun simply patterned stuff. When your options for low FGO JS files are Pants, Pants, or Pants, perhaps we could use a few more.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

I actually rather non artsy files, most of mine are simple. There is a way to make good easy js files, but when the whole file is a huge dumpstream, I hardly see any quality or effort involved

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

Effort. That's the word we were all looking for. There has to be effort given in every dimension of the file - its sync, patterns, etc. Without effort, what you often get are dumps or jokes which aren't worth it :(

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

I don't really care about effort, I care about results. Some of the most widely enjoyed, classic files had about zero effort put into them. FFR's Vertex Beta was made in about 10 minutes, I know because I saw Shash do it. It's still one of the most played VCs in the game and is considered a benchmark for streaming skills. Simply put, it's a really fun file that fits into FFR very well.

It's all about results. Do people enjoy the file, is it properly synced and fit into the overall scope of the game? If it does I don't give a shit how much effort was put in, it's a good file.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

Shash is also an FFR Legend. lol

But I do get your point. ;)

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

It was one of the most played vcs because at one point I unlocked on oni lol
Some quickly stepped files can be fun but for the most part when you rush a file its noticeable and the file suffers. To get results you put effort that's how it works

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

Yep. We should have some unlockable mid-high FGO dumps.

You missed Pants. How could you possibly forget that one?

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
 

Gunkienen Tarusuigin? pretty sure I noticed some people saying that they thought it should have been an 11, so it can't be that high... (granted, it's a bit denser than your normal jumpstream)

still... it is notable issue, there really isn't much else