Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

perhaps 3 judges notes is sufficient?

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

That's what I've been saying all along haha.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

Whatever happens, happens. I just foresee a problem with only 3 judges..

Randomly thought of this, it may sound stupid. If only 3 judges are used for that group, of the grades received, could you possibly add the average of the 3 scores to be the 4th score? Example; a file received 4, 4, 3. Average of those is 3.67 and that or the rounded up or down of the average would be the "fourth judge". Then the total score for that file would be 14/15 depending on how you calculated it.

Just a thought :/

EDIT: Thought #2 [yea, I'm full of them]. Even though this is likely what does happen already, just make the judging out of 15 instead and determine what would be accepted out of 15, which would likely be something along the lines of 12+.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

In case of tie breakers just send to other judges like was done with all the other files. This would throw off the point system though since it was based off 4 judges' scores.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

this seems like the best solution, because the three initial judge ratings wouldn't be affected, whereas adding a fourth could potentially mess them up due to pressure of time constraints, etc.

EDIT: forgot to add something -- there would be two separate borderlines for the batch; 4 group batch would have either 15/16 and 3 would be 11/12, right? then have all judges vote on borderline files.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

Halogen: nah, a file from the 3-judge part of the batch would need at least 17 out of 15 points to make it ingame. 16 out of 15 would be okay if people really like the file. Why would we bother changing the bar just because there are fewer judges?


Honestly I think 3 judges is no worse than 4. One judge can already ruin a file by giving it a -, and 3 judges doesn't really make that situation any better or worse.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

25/15 for [++]. no need to adjust.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

Brenton Mah 9:58 pm
I'm sort of leaning for you to be the 4th judge then.

jimerax (jimerax) is available 10:11 pm
jimerax 10:12 pm
fine

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

Make patashus judgements all be +. And release the notes

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

haha, that'd be awesome

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

*humbly opens himself up to judging for the next batch*


Since I'm not going to be busy ever again (no longer in the military)

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

By the way people, notes will not be released today. Expect them sometime by the end of the week, or whenever jx is done.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

:( I might be in the hospital by then.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

We've used a 3 judge system before, why not use it here? It seems rather pointless to wait. In a three judge system, if a file is getting accepted by all the judges, it's most certainly going to get accepted by judge #4, and if it doesn't, it's an unnecessary skew of ratings that will cause even more issues.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

Metro (DossarLX ODI) - 16 (5/5/1/5)

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

I kinda agree with this, I think most people would rather have their reviews now than wait a week for a fourth set to be done. Speaking as a judge, too, I wouldn't mind judging the borderline files. It seems more efficient to just leave it as three judges for this time around.

Nuance.

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

I call dibs on Outer Space before you step all of the Jenkees :P
Also I have a chart of Throwing Fire if you're interested (its got holds though).

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

remove the holds in throwing fire and submit it to the batch, nothing wrong with some competition :p

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

Has to be next round. I only get the 1 song to submit :(

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
 

you should have 2 submissions i think...

Also, if you read the OP, they're saying something about having the batch closed for a while, and if you read the last couple pages of posts, theres something about special batches that might periodically open. So.....