Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG
 

By the first they, I meant six. Please accept my apolojuice. It's sugary.

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG
 

Alright, jump on the bandwagon if you want. Let's lynch 4. (I already bolded his name in another post)

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG
 

I completely disagree. This game is anonymous for a reason, and half of the fun is how you go about using the theme to your advantage.


Cheers,
Synthlight

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG
 

Speaking of anonymous... ten where the hell are you?


Cheers,
Synthlight

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG
 

Nice of you to join us 3. Caught up on the thread yet?

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG
 

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG
 

to address this point, i spoke it over earlier with twg2 over aim to discuss the reasoning behind random guesses of people:

in this stage of the game, there is a larger human : wolf ratio meaning that an early human sacrifice for a correct guess on a wolf would be incredibly beneficial to humans. the only reason a human would want to call out someone else's account in the thread is that they have a reasonable suspicion of the person being a wolf. IF the guess is correct, guess what, you're down a human OR wolf. i would say in the thread 'i think person x is this person's account and is a wolf and will vote to kill them.' if you catch a human, well gg u suck; if you catch a wolf, well gg u pro. either way they'll probably want to confide with you in order to prevent their death, and at that point it's up to your discretion whether or not you want to still kill them, based on their defense.

IF you publicly announce that you figured out someone's account and you think they're human, then you're a fucking moron..but i don't see anyone doing that now right

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG
 

oh i forgot to add the part that it's kind of important to hint that you're trying to kill someone, or at least tell more than one person over aim that you're trying to guess their account so people would know whether or not you died from incorrectly guessing someone, or that you die because someone accurately guessed who you are

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG
 

twg1 I do not entirely agree. With a large human to wolf ratio, a human will be less likely to hit a wolf with a guess kill than with a smaller human to wolf ratio. Now may not be the time for such action. The effectiveness of your proposed strategy also depends on how accurate are the guesses. A human player ought not to submit a guess unless player is confident about said guess.

twg6 I do not like your vote. No, I do not like your vote one bit. Placing a vote on a player that has not posted much if at all is a bland thing to do. By doing this you fade into the background, which is exactly what a wolf wants to do. Twg6 I think you are a wolf player.

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG
 

I don't understand your rationale. I voted for them as pressure to get them to engage in conversation, as has been done many times in many different games. It's a tactic used if someone is either trying to play under-the-radar or simply has disappeared off the map (which in this case could be either option). To think that I would just place my vote on a one-post player and fade "into the background" is a silly assumption.


Cheers,
Synthlight

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG
 

If you think that using the pressure-vote tactic is a "bland" thing to do, 9, what would you suggest to be the best course of action for the current moment?

Cheers,
Synthlight

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG
 

I encounter millions of bodies in my life; of these millions, I may desire some hundreds; but of these hundreds, I love only one.

TWG1 - 0 - TWG15
TWG14 - 1 - TWG15
TWG13 - 1 - TWG4, TWG14
TWG4 - 3 - TWG13, TWG8, TWG2
TWG9 - 1 - TWG7
TWG5 - 1 - TWG12
TWG2 - 2 - TWG15, TWG1
TWG12 - 1 - TWG14
TWG10 - 1 - TWG6
TWG6 - 1 - TWG9

feel free to double check

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG
 

LOL

yea i also don't see any reason not to put a vote on someone inactive, especially if it's a safety vote, pretty much

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG
 

I'm on board with 6 right now. It doesn't seem 6's goal is to fade "into the background." I don't have a solid read on 6 at the moment, but it's not leaning toward "WOLF."

Something is fishy about 9's direct calling you out as "I think you are a wolf player."

At this point, I'm still keeping my vote on 4, but 9, I'm keeping my eye on you.

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG
 

TWG EIGHT what makes my comment fish-like?

I meant not to say that you would stop playing or talking but rather that your vote appears as though you are actively trying to fit in with the crowd.

Humans should be voting to kill wolves. Putting pressure on a player by inching the player closer to death could be useful, I am not sure. I will consider that. However, this would be a more effectual tactic when used on a player more likely to respond, no?

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG
 

nobody has been talking to me on aim and it's making me sad :(

Unless you are 2 who thinks he knows who I am and won't shut up about it or if you are 9 who AT LEAST said the word hello and nothing else to me.

Dohohoho...

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG
 

Looks like you don't take offline messages, buddy. Dohohoho!

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG
 

I agree, that whole post was fishy. I don't like your tone TWG9

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG
 

So i've been debating whether or not I should bring this to light:

I talked with Fiction about how player guessing works in relation to being lynched. He confirmed that a scenario could exist where someone knows they are about to 100% get insta-lynched, and therefore sends in a guess on a player. It doesn't matter if they are wrong about who it is, because they are going to die from the insta anyways. If they are right though, the guess does count (even if they are insta'd) and the person who was named therefore dies.

This does not seem like a good mechanic for us humans to know about, which is why I was a bit worried about bringing it up. It presents the chance for wolves to take someone else out with them. My worry is that an apathetic human on the verge of death will take a guess at someone for fun, without realizing that it will still count if they are lynched. I'd rather not lose more people than we need to.

This message is brought to you by The International Foundation Against The Discrimination Of Mimzies™.

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG
 

CLARIFICATION

ONE GUESS PER PLAYER PER PHASE. NO CHANGES.

should have mentioned that before