PDA

View Full Version : YOU CAN'T DO THAT!


evilbutterfly
March 19th, 2005, 12:11 AM
IT'LL CREATE A TIME PARADOX!

blitzmage
March 19th, 2005, 03:51 AM
SNNNNAAAAAAAKE! COME IN! SNAAAAAAAAAAKE!

evilbutterfly
March 19th, 2005, 06:41 PM
If you get inside the box, you'll know what I mean!


Man, I don't want to know what you mean!

Verruckter
March 19th, 2005, 06:55 PM
HURT ME MORE SNAKE

ddrruler
March 19th, 2005, 07:13 PM
****ING snake bit me on the way out!!

Spheroid
March 19th, 2005, 07:34 PM
If you create a time pardox, will it matter? Probably not. Let me tell you why in this complex, senseless, essay I call Seeing in Sphero-vision Now, by creating a time paradox, you are making events impossible to occur, because their past changes, not allowing their current future to exist. By throwing pi and pie into that equation, you come out with something of a rather disturbing case, but I won't go into that until later. Back to the latter subject, I'll mention it later down. Anyway, this would ineffect, create a parallel universe, because we humans, having brains the size of half a basketball, lack imagination to create a better way to solve the problem. This new parallel universe would ignore our future, and make a new one based on the altered past, also creating another dimension, in which our future is the same, but our past changes, because I said so. That dimension will be shoved into the pi/pie formerly mentioned for later digestion. Moving on, we go to the fact that maybe the idea of destiny doesn't allow parallel universe, destroying our pi. The same basic occurences might be destined to happen, so no matter what is changed in the past, our future remains the same. But then, the time paradox would not exist because it would be solved, either proving this is impossible to be the truth, or that eb is about to die (again). Anyway, according to the correct religion, destiny does not exist, so that idea will be discarded and not mentioned. Back to the time paradox. The new parallel universes would start rapidly creating more parallel universes, resulting in the multiverse eventually getting full. The paradox would destroy everything we now, except our universe cause we think we're special. Leaving us with earth, and this thread. But wait, that whole idea takes away the meaning of the paradox, so if it be true, the time paradox has still yet to be created! Therefore, we must forget everything discussed above because it is unrelated and and unworthy, EXCEPT the pi/pie, which will be digested/computed now. So we take the pi-pie therom discussed in detail above and possibly below, and divide that by some formula you learned last year. We end up with some very pointless equation that probably was solved the wrong way to begin with. We eat the pie and move on to furthur ideas written below; basically, see above. Eb's time paradox must work, according to the "what eb said earlier postulate" and something must result in it. There is obviously no explanation for what happend, for a paradox is physically and spiritually impossible. Therfore, eb was correct in his title and explanation, and no furthur details exist and/or should be discussed.

EDIT: Damn, I read the title wrong.

blitzmage
March 20th, 2005, 03:54 AM
Is there a way to take off my pants?

Spheroid
March 20th, 2005, 12:15 PM
If it's not written above, then no.

Moogy
March 20th, 2005, 12:24 PM
You can't do that/You can't do that

alainbryden
March 20th, 2005, 12:26 PM
this would ineffect

don't you mean "render ineffective"

You can't do that.

trillobyite
March 21st, 2005, 02:19 PM
Snake and Meryl, sitting in a time paradox... K-I-S-S-I-N-G. First comes love, then comes marriage, then comes FFR in a worm hole baby transmitting machine!

Charlotte21
March 21st, 2005, 02:48 PM
I liked the part where influxations in time were plausible. That part was my favorite.

tsutter
March 21st, 2005, 03:52 PM
CAN'T LET YOU DO THAT STAR FOX